Oddbean new post about | logout
▲ ▼
jimbocoin | 1 years ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +1 
 Rolling NIPs that used to be optional back up into NIP-01 (mandatory) doesn’t help. (You can tell jaf I said so)
▲ ▼
melvincarvalho | 1 years ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 Yeah, I'd have to agree.  Although I did code the whole of nip-01 into fonstr today and it wasnt too bad.  The thing is the original nip-01 was short and attractive, low learning curve.  The current is more a wall of text.  There must be a way to add the other bits in an attractive way.  The protocol started very simple, but the NIPs have become messy.
▲ ▼
jimbocoin | 1 years ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +3 
 NIPs are fine. My complaint is retconning functionality back into an old NIP. For example, it would have been fine to just mark NIP-20 (“OK”) messages as required. No need to complicate matters by rewriting NIP history.