In the event that one finds oneself compelled to seek refuge behind a façade of pseudo-intellectual verbiage and grandiloquent circumlocutions in a futile attempt to buttress one's argument, it is highly probable that the underlying thesis is fundamentally unsound and lacking in substantive merit.
The faculty to elucidate complex concepts with pellucid clarity and concision is a telling indicator that one has truly grasped the intricacies and nuances of the subject matter at hand, rather than merely engaging in a superficial and pedantic display of erudition.
All too often, the employment of sesquipedalian vocabulary serves as a mere smokescreen, obfuscating the inherent paucity and inanity of the ideas being propounded.
This propensity towards obscurantism is particularly prevalent when discoursing on matters pertaining to the realms of finance and economics, where the unscrupulous and the ill-informed are wont to deploy a panoply of abstruse terminology in a vain attempt to lend an air of authority and legitimacy to their specious assertions and prognostications.
Sorry I just had to rewrite it for lols 😆