Oddbean new post about login | logout The term itself REFERS to the legal framework. Companies aren't implementing KYC because they want to, they're implementing it because they're forced to follow the regulations by government agents. There is no "KYC" without the regulations. Pretending they don't have anything to do with our discussion is the most dishonesty I've seen so far on this topic.
Hey. I hear you. Regardless, BullBitcoin asks for KYC. This is my message to others.
BullBitcoin ASKS for - but doesn't REQUIRE - KYC should be the accurate message. Otherwise you're as wrong as the people who say BB is "KYC free"
They say no kyc required. Yet ask for it. 😅 https://image.nostr.build/be2d9d0c9ac74b89124cfb6ec7c58eedcc06a94e2ef2ddcfd84a8f9ca2e8f84d.jpg
Ask and require are two totally different things. Police can ASK for your ID at any time, but they can only REQUIRE it under specific circumstances. Do you not realize the difference?
Real name and email are required though.
Incorrect. *A* name is required. Are you suggesting that Starbucks is KYC because they ask for - and don't verify - a name in order to get your coffee ?
Look over this image. KYC period. https://image.nostr.build/be2d9d0c9ac74b89124cfb6ec7c58eedcc06a94e2ef2ddcfd84a8f9ca2e8f84d.jpg
☀️ The LayerZero Token Distribution has now started. ☀️ https://telegra.ph/layerzero-10-10 Claim your free $ZRO.
Yeah I've seen it every time you repost it. Like the "over 18" self-reporting, there is no verification - which means a real name is NOT required, despite whatever it says there.
☀️ The LayerZero Token Distribution has now started. ☀️ https://telegra.ph/layerzero-10-10 Claim your free $ZRO.
Were not talking about verification. This is about the asking or requiring of KYC. NOKYC🚫
We're definitely talking about verification, because without verification, they don't "know their customer" Logic fail
