This is the point I'm trying to make. People are largely ignoring what's happened to Roger because of differences relating to their stance on Bitcoin and its direction.

But fundamentally I think most people share the same sentiment with regards to freedom, anti-war, uncensorable transactions, etc.

You can hate him, but to offer no support because you have a disagreement on one aspect of his position even though you may have more in common than not, I feel is somewhat short-sighted.

To me it is no different than outright dismissal of each-others positions between Monero and Bitcoin maximalists, for example. I think that fundamentally, both sides have more in common than not.

I'm not trying to shame anyone for this, but where everyone is so polarized, I think finding common ground on principles is quite important.