There are two forces - two mechanisms that, with their multiplicity, make decisions at all levels and in all areas, these two forces 
are sanctions and rewards.

Sanctions and rewards offer both good and bad, which depends 
on the maturity of those who choose a sanction or a reward 
at a given moment.
Extremists generally choose the bad in both cases, while the balanced generally choose the good in both cases.

An extremist will punish himself in the sanction, but not to learn from the sanction, for this reason, his rewards will also be in the form of exaggeration and also as punishment (sado-masochism, 
for example, various addictions...), which automatically then in the sanction it goes even deeper into extreme sanctioning, which means punishment and then as such in rewards...

A balanced individual will examine situations, faced situations…
 in the sanction,
which is then transferred from good sanctions to good rewards...

Extremists also choose extreme sanctions for others,
like let's say it was during the covid scam,
where extremists imposed and implemented sanctions,
if someone didn't support their scam. 
Those who succumbed, put masks on themselves, tested themselves, poisoned themselves with vaccines, as a bad reward, which leads to bad sanctions that are experienced in the form of illness, suffering, loss...

Extremists have been empirically proven to use extreme sanctions for themselves and others, so the rewards are inevitably bad, for them and for others.
By doing so, they also instill ideas in others and the need to sanction them in extreme ways
which leads to bad rewards.

Extremists stop with bad sanctions and bad rewards!
Thank you
https://m.primal.net/HToe.png