Whoever is keeping meeting minutes during the vote, perhaps? I'm assuming there's some discussion of the acceptance criteria and then a vote. 

 and simply share the notes and remove the names for privacy if that is the issue. 

 Or have AI write a summary for each application discussed. 

 Someone should start an org with all those ideas. There is need for even more options. 

 You asked a question. I gave you a reasonable answer.
It is fair to assume that the selection and evaluation is being recorded, in some way, as that is standard practice for meetings.

Simply structure the process, from the beginning, so that it is transparent, in the end. That will lower the amount of effort required, in the mid-term, not raise it. 

 How is feedback not a requirement, but instead a cop-out: "it's simply too resource intensive"   

 The organization that’s taken in 10s of millions of dollars maybe?

You insinuated that responding to dozens of people is to burdensome maybe you should step down and give your spot to someone who can allocate the proper amount of time to respond to applicants.

Without applicants opensats is nothing. Opensats owes everything to those that apply, if not opensats wouldn’t have a purpose. 

You seem to have a problem with having open conversations, what’s the issue with having a discussion in public? The reason is you don’t want feed back you want yes men.

Get off your fucking high horse bro. 

 It's a dozen ppl responding to hundreds. You got it inverted. We are also always taking volunteers. Please apply.