but actually the question is, which branch should be the one people see as "default" dev, or master?

one looks like slow motion, the other is active, all changes that are working but maybe unstable go there (they compile, ofc)

who is more important in open source? the devs who might contribute or audit or test, or the public?

the public doesn't matter, they go to the landing page not the repo 

 Yup, the active one  :Check:  

 I don't know, but I've been trying to review other people's stuff, and submit issues, and it's just too much bother, in this case. Like trying to interact with a brick wall. They just ignore me, every time, and now this.

They're looking for adoration, not collaboration, so I'm not the droids they're looking for. 

 yeah, i had that with LND and BTCD too 

 https://realy.lol won't be mean to you tho, i promise 

 help with documentation and document comments and asking pointy questions about "wtf is this shit bro" will definitely most warmly welcomed 

 🫡