Yeah so the node sees it. Which is 1 in 16
Yeah but Monero’s ring signatures select random transactions to use as decoys. If transactions (even if intended to be public) are ruled out as the potential sender, it hurts Monero’s privacy at a rate directly proportional to how popular the nostr zap is. Think about it, if 90% of transactions are nostr zaps, then the 10% of “private” transactions then it's badly hurt.
Yes if it’s kept private, then its totally fine. Yes complex zkProofs can also be used, that our team is ALSO NOT doing due to cost. I’m sorry to hear you’re thinking of quitting, maybe your client can be integrated with our rebelnet.me setup? I’m not concerned with the bounty, more so with spreading adoption
Well what are the requirements on the bounty? Because ours doesn’t have a built-in wallet, it’s the server side level first. Then we’re going to add the wallet-client later. How’s the android version doing the server-side? It just posts it with a certain tag to the main relays, and then only that client can see it?
it would be good to work with retnull regardless of bounty, our's has an API he can easily add to get the server-side. Do you have his contact info? Thanks so much for your replies
alright thanks for the insight mate