Oddbean new post about | logout
▲ ▼
Kanzan | 6 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 kids,
when the DOJ says they have "marketing materials proving the defendants conspired to assist criminals avoid law enforcement detection"

DONT always believe them unquestionably. 

nostr:nevent1qqsfpsz3xjpg0v2rrz7c3ecvcaaef68gyxa8phdn52te6evtj8ucjvgpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumn0wd68ytnzv9hxgq3qxsn2cx73w7837xhkqalzxr5f9prwn6cvnz4t0e60qa0luff7g4fqxpqqqqqqzazd374
▲ ▼
Mel | 6 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 Well, I hope you’re right and I hope you understand the law like you think you do
▲ ▼
Kanzan | 6 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +1 
 I'm not claiming to be some legal expert Mel

I'm just pointing out the indictment gives no context for these jpegs and its ridiculous to take the DOJs word for what they are.
▲ ▼
Mel | 6 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 Once again, I’m not in love with the DOJ either but it’s fairly well-known that they spend a good amount of time putting a case together this indictment does not have all the evidence in it probably not even 1/10 of it was to get a warrant for the rest of it, they’ll put in the trial or they will use to get them to make a deal if it’s bad enough. I don’t like the American government but read any of their indictments about anything over the past couple of weeks for example they use dates and times and very seldom. Is it something they just threw together