@106ab8b7 @b8e4a7a8 Or maybe, and I'm just spitballing here, an affected company could file a lawsuit focusing on the specific burdens imposed by the general editorial transparency requirements rather than addressing them in conclusory terms in a few paragraphs of declarations. 

NetChoice and its members made some very cautious litigation choices, and if they couldn't be bothered to build a record on the issue, it's hard to blame the Supreme Court for not taking it up. 

 @db4ecdd4 @b8e4a7a8 I'm more sympathetic to page limits than you are, but I also agree that the SG has a pretty good point about the state of the record. Might actually be better to address later--the district court in TX, at the very least, will be open to this argument