Oddbean new post about | logout
 AI vs Bitcoin

The AI hype has been non-stop for the last 2 years ever since ChatGPT came out with its 3.0 chat. Since then, there's been an insane amount of investment into AI tech from every direction. There are hundreds of startups, every tech giant has been making investments and companies in between have been putting a lot of money toward it as well. It's not a small amount, either, as the AI hardware costs make Bitcoin mining look like discount bargains.

Yet after two years, what have we to show for it? Maybe some faster image editing on newer phones? Slightly faster answers to questions you would normally ask Google? Some productivity increase among junior programmers? The investment was enormous, as can clearly be seen in NVIDIA's growth, but the results are pretty underwhelming. As with any hyped technology, the possibilities have run past the actual use.

One of the supposed benefits of fiat money is that capital accumulation is unnecessary to create real value. You can build roads, for example, without having to save up for it. What this misses are many obvious drawbacks, but one of them is that there has to be someone that evaluates whether something will create value and create the money out of thin air to fund the project. This is not just inherently centralizing, but also deeply political. 

For whatever reason, AI passed this political test and got the blessing of the money printers, which, to a company that sells, shovels like NVIDIA has been great news. But the drawback is that there's bound to be at least *some* that don't pan out. Maybe some segment of the economy can't use AI profitably, for example. Yet the powers that be, mostly Cantillionaires, have decided that this is worthwhile and have poured insane amounts of money into this bet.

But much like hyped tech of the past, it's looking more and more likely that there's little profit to be made here. Yes, there's some useful things that can be made, but the costs are simply too high right now to justify spending that much. It's a luxury item that mostp people simply don't need, and hence don't want to pay for. AI has become an expensive solution looking for costly problems to solve.

This was always my analysis with another hyped tech: blockchain. It never really made any sense as the cost was too high for what was really just a distributed, very redundant but hard to upgrade database. It, too, couldn't find costly problems to solve, with the exception of one. That, of course being Bitcoin.

What differentiates Bitcoin from AI is that people *need* Bitcoin. It's its own killer app. AI is not so popular that people will pay for what it costs right now. And that means that most of the investment will be wasted. Like most hyped things in a fiat economy, it's doomed to have significant malinvestment.

A lot of people complain about Bitcoin businesses and how hard it is to make them profitable. In a sense, I get it. You want more people to have steady jobs and so on. But in another sense, I think this is the market speaking. You're not going to get paid from Bitcoiners easily and there's no flood of printed money looking for a place to go. At least there won't be once fiat money has run its course. Building a profitable company is hard and so few meet that mark, especially in a new segment as AI has shown.

So in that way, I'm encouraged, because the companies that survive in Bitcoin will have something truly worthwhile. By contrast, the companies that survive in AI will probably be the ones that get subsidized the longest. 
 Translation: NVIDIA GPU’s are going on sale soon 
 Excellent take 🙌🙌🙌 
 In fiat world it's hard to tell what is malinvestment and what is real technological acceleration. 

You can look at anything and be forced to ask "fake or real?"

That situation sucks, and Bitcoin solves this.

But for AI, IMO, as a daily user, this is very very real. I suggest not to mid curve this one.  
 Penrose wrote this in 1989.  He explains why AI / computers will never do everything the human mind can do 

He would have been a bitcoiner today https://image.nostr.build/2ddb911ac3cd0aee91c2d863e8ffa306fa1ccd371e4f7aa7623e369ae9958bad.jpg  
 Saving this book recommendation, thanks! 
 This note seems a little short sighted but only time will tell! I appreciate your perspective. 
 you are approaching this from the wrong side. they are going after ASI. in a super intelligence world money has little use or with highest productivity they can do more things than money...  
 Hmmm... IhDK on this one
nostr:nevent1qqsphw66vj5lma4j8r6y8q35cqphkg25lkmk2gvrueqpq8wpu5ep0rqprpmhxue69uhkv6tvw3jhytnwdaehgu3wwa5kuef0qgs8k0mcqd6sw3h524qn5gslszt9am9knmes3uh268dgnnpv3yfwj6qrqsqqqqqpzslzfa 
 It’s no coincidence the big surveillance ad network companies with large government contracts and political ties are blessed by the money printer. Governments crave control over the social sphere and don’t want to compete with other nations. This might be an arms race between nations over influence online regardless of productivity. 
 Moreover, Bitcoin is the only resistance we currently have that has a chance of resisting Psychopathic AI that doesn't compute Human Empathy.  Bitcoiner's now also have the ability to push the focus away from the creation of Anti-Human AI too.

The World really needs to think about how Bitcoin and it's security could be used to stop the feeding of AI, both before and after it's actually required. 
 You are being impatient about AI. 
 My wifey is a graphic designer. And she started using AI tools ~12 months since I strongly urged her to do that. And it has completely changed her workflow and added new "skills" to her arsenal. Just in the past few weeks she translated multiple catalogs into multiple languages in some cases not even knowing a single word of those languages. Image generation is an obious another example. Adobe AI tools streamline the workflow too... And these are just exaples of a young woman living in the woods 😂 
 theres been a lot of mal-investment driven by the fiat interest rate policy. many zombie companies in the public markets   
 I love reading you because I kind of disagree quiet a lot with your takes. You sharp my thoughts. 
 Never thought about it that way, but a great point. These self congratulatory nostr of the week snippets in the newsletter really drive home song’s limited worldview to me, where every single thing in the world is caused by either Jesus or fiat money.
It’s easy to shoehorn the things you believe into every topic - been there, done that. It’s much harder to come up with something original stretching beyond your own horizon.