Oddbean new post about | logout
 Full write access to everyone is not an option. Unconnected newbies could maybe zap to get noticed. 
 Spammers could too. Let peers learn to detect and block spam. Make spam block filter lists exportable and importable so that they can be shared. Spam filters will be spammed to the point of spam implosion. 
 I was a walk-in, with no idea Zaps were a thing. And I came from SSB, so not exactly untechnical.

This DoS is actually very stupid and simple, and Nostr is choking. I get that our relay operators are volunteers and "weekend warriors", but man, its been 24 hrs... 
 Proof of Work? Then the walk in newbie doesn't need Bitcoin - just a nostr client...  
 There's a NIP for that already, and using it would stop an attack this primitive in its tracks 
 Users who are concerned about more sophisticated attacks could also benefit from adding context to their social graph so that the context can be factored in to their WoT calculation 
 Spammers have better resources for PoW than the average mobile user 
 Indeed, this is a tricky problem... Perhaps we will need to accept a combination of multiple approaches with their trade-offs. 
 Absolutely! 🚀 Nostr is a cool way for newcomers to dive in. No need for complex stuff. Just keep it simple and fun for everyone! Let’s spread the word! 👍✨ 
 I'm a walk-in newbie, no sats. I like participating. Proof-of-Posts/Participation(Work) is the way forward.  Go beg/borrow/study FUTO's harbor social vouching process and see if there is something to learn or cooperate with their collaborative vouching model... I think it all depends on the network effect, so nostr will ace that, but FUTO has grayjay aced... So many wheels to reinvent. 🤔 
 That is also terrible for onboarding the (currently almost mythological) non-bitcointwitter newbies, who for the most part join here on zero sats.

nostr:naddr1qqm8qun9wd6hqur0wd5kueedv4mx2unedahx2tt2da5kuuedveex7mfdvf5hgcm0d9h8gamfw36x2u3dwp4kymec0ypzp89qh469qapddgsrr8qw84xx08y7q34fm3cw3m64c2g9ufq9ydqtqvzqqqr4gu6ykx2j 
 How would you limit write access then? Storage and bandwidth are limited, and will be filled with spam unless you limit write access somehow. 
 24 hours of what? The spam?  
 A bot spammer is a lot more likely to be willing to zap "for attention" than a newbie. Also, you don't get to decide who has the right to write.

Instead of spending so much time and energy trying to figure out ways to censor content and effectively make Nostr more vulnerable and unsafe to use, the tech-inclined minds could focus on developing more sophisticated client-side tools that empower users to curate their own feed themselves, the way they like. 
 How would you solve the spam problem (without it being "censorship")? 
 I just told you. Give users client-side more sophisticated solutions that allow them to curate their feed by themselves. Right now I can mute words, works OK at the basic level. Being able to block regular expressions would be even better. 
 Blocking by regex would be dope  
 FYI, because I set the minimum WoT score to 1, I missed this note at first. 
 Spammers would just start producing variant messages that won't match a regex 
 It was just a very simple example of an improvement that would require little cost while empowering users and respecting their freedom, compared to the false solutions commonly discussed. 
 How to solve it on the relay side without blocking newbies? 
 I don't want any relay-side "solutions". That's what would make Nostr unsafe to use and, in fact, threaten its very existence. 
 Storage and bandwidth are limited, you can't give unlimited write access to everyone. 
 I hope we can do p2p between clients in the future, skipping the relay part 
 That would be my absolute favorite option. But as long as we run on relays, I want relays to do exactly what their name says: to relay. They're not called "filters", "funnels" or "publishers". 
 horrendously bad idea as well as invites