Oddbean new post about | logout
▲ ▼
janis | 9 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +1 
 Yeah, pretty much. We basically started the government, the military, the intelligence services from scratch right away. Whereas in Ukraine initially the same Soviet institutions persisted. Including the personnel.

But there are reasons for that. Our historical situation was markedly different. Latvia was a full fledged nation during the whole interwar period. One that was well developed industrially and socially. Think interwar Denmark or Finland. So from our perspective, and also according to internation law, we restarted that country, treating the Soviet Period as illegal occupation. As we didnt want a repeat of that situation we single mindedly took the geopolitical course "as far away from Russia as we can get".

For all the other ex-Soviet countries apart from the Baltics the situation was different in that for them the independence sort of 'happened'. E.g., they didnt spend late eighties trying to get out of it. So then the response was different too.
▲ ▼
cryptohamster | 9 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +2 
 I think both Russia and Ukraine share the experience of never really having been nation-states. They both alternated between being regions of an empire and semi-anarchy.

I have friends who went through the 90s in both, and I think we're very forgetful in the West about how total that collapse was. There wasn't any model of common knowledge for them to snap back to :/
▲ ▼
janis | 9 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +1 
 Sort of. Except Russia is the empire. There are still many federation subjects with their own "titular" ethnicities. Bashkirs, Tatars, Karelians, and more.  I think that's part of the problem that they can't figure out of they're running a nation state or an empire.

But yeah, Russia hasn't successfully run a democracy for a meaningful period of time. So they don't have the collective memory to fall back on how to run a democratic country. They then believe en-masse that it's not actually possible, and that it's a sham everywhere. 

It really looked like there was a period after the Soviet Union where they really tried to run a "normal" country. Then that didn't work out, so they fell back to what they're used to - having a tsar. If you look at Russian history, that's a recurring pattern. They try to modernize and be like any other European country, then that doesn't work, then they become antagonistic to the West. Then they lag behind in development. Then someone figures to try and modernize and be "normal". Rinse and repeat. I hope they can somehow break out of that cycle eventually.
▲ ▼
cryptohamster | 9 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +1 
 A genuine Russo-Futurism would be beautiful. 50 ton nuclear bullet trains sweeping over the tundra carrying CosmoX rockets to their Siberian launchpads.

They could do so much with their interior's resources and the education they inherited from the Soviet era.

But, no, Moscow needed to antagonise and go to war with the most culturally Russophile state in Eastern Europe 🤦‍♂️