Is this yet another indication that I just need to accept that "sunk" is now acceptable as a simple past tense of "sink"? Has "sank" sunk? What say you #editors? #usage https://storage.googleapis.com/indieauthors/media_attachments/files/111/182/726/991/693/558/original/386c8e55225574f5.jpg
@787c481a I'd still change it if I were editing, but just a couple of days ago, I used "sunk" for "sank" when talking to Pat and then thought, "Wait, that's wrong." I went through the triplet in my mind — sink, sank, have sunk — and shrugged.