Oddbean new post about | logout
▲ ▼
melvincarvalho | 3 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 Great info thanks.  So I think distributing a token in a fair way is always going to be hard.  While bitcoin is not perfect in that regard, I think it's about ad good as we can do.  If darkfi is just technology that's great.  Could we add it onto bitcoin or L2?
▲ ▼
Juraj | 3 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 I don't know, probably possible. If it's smart, I don't know. The team that's been working on it full time for years has to be paid.

I don't even know if it's that great, I'm just telling you what they have right now.

I remember a story by the author of the original coin that became Monero. He said that Monero is proud to have a fair launch and he replied that fair launch is super easy when you take someone else's months of work, change the name of the coin, release schedule (probably one day worth of work) and post it on GitHub. 

I'm not that strict with Bitcoin only and launches, I think open market for discovering what is fair and how to do these things is great. I think Ethereum was too much, but the market seems to be ok with it, it's very successful, people are actually paying fees and even holding, because they find it useful.
▲ ▼
Juraj | 3 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 Probably, the question is how to do it in a way that the team can keep working on it. sustainability is key here, otherwise it would result in a very underfunded project.

I'd rather have a separate service with its own token and a wrapped representation of bitcoin providing additional services like anonymous exchange and lending products than an underfunded L2.

Ultimately it's on the team and the users to agree on model (including financial model) that works for everyone. I don't think they are thinking about Bitcoin L2, although it's FOSS, so if someone invests energy into turning it to L2, they are free to do so.