Oddbean new post about | logout
▲ ▼
Vitor Pamplona | 2 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +3 
 On the list, but we never found a stable Tor library to use inside Amethyst. Much less one that we can control the routes to avoid routing everything through the same nodes.
▲ ▼
lunaticoin | 2 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 nostr:nprofile1qqsxg45ph8gx0vdrvtzta6xal7v86frx6jvstsnvhrlvtehmwwh4epqpz4mhxue69uhk2er9dchxummnw3ezumrpdejqz8thwden5te0dehhxarj94c82c3wwajkcmr0wfjx2u3wdejhgqg6waehxw309ahx7um5wgh8xct5wd68yctvd9sjucm0d5gajr69 maybe you have an idea on this?
▲ ▼
KoalaSat | 2 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +1 
  On desktop, if you are using linux, you can configure system's proxy to route connections to port 9050 and add a nice rule to only do it for *.onion

On mobile, I remember talking with Victor about kmp-tor, but I wasn't sure how it behaves with WS (I'll test it for Robosats soon BTW 😬) did you check it out @Vitor Pamplona ?

Interesting topic setting different exit nodes on demand. Maybe you can do that with https://torproject.gitlab.io/torspec/control-spec/#redirectstream , and I know the new version for kmp-tor has planned to implement it
▲ ▼
Vitor Pamplona | 2 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 I didn't check lately, but yes the idea of setting a different route per account or per subscription is key for a more private browsing using Amethyst.

Otherwise, the server can just bundle a bunch of filters together and start tracking users even without a stableish IP behind it
▲ ▼
0xtr | 2 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 How would you manage clearnet relay connections? I guess you'd lose the privacy of Tor if some connections goes over clearnet and some over Tor?
▲ ▼
Vitor Pamplona | 2 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 No clear net connections at all.
▲ ▼
Madutxo | 2 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +1 
 If it helps.. Routing to port 9050 has been recently implemented in 0xchat NOSTR client.