Oddbean new post about | logout
▲ ▼
Sarah Burstein | 1 years ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 "The Court will not give it another opportunity to do what it should have done from the outset: bring factually and legally sound claims."

https://files.mastodon.social/media_attachments/files/111/024/265/909/736/750/original/6c147b704b654c7c.jpg
▲ ▼
Sarah Burstein | 1 years ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 I am delighted to see that this decision ended up on Westlaw, 2023 WL 5748350, and Lexis, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 157275. 

This case needs to be found, read, and cited broadly.
▲ ▼
c80dd724 | 1 years ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 @e7f76f0d Beautiful.
The only thing that would have made it better is if the judge ordered the attorneys to attend a CLE on trademark law
▲ ▼
yes, it's me, liza :) | 1 years ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 @e7f76f0d you are an amazing teacher. thank you for bringing attention to case. ever since Mattel tried to shake down my ex-husband and me for a parody site we created back in the 1990s, i’ve tried to keep up with the shenanigans involving  IP laws
▲ ▼
Sarah Burstein | 1 years ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 @8388665a Thank you for saying that! And I'd love to hear more about your parody site if you're ever interested in sharing
▲ ▼
85c220e6 | 1 years ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 @e7f76f0d /1/ The sanctions decision is good as far as it goes, but have you looked at DN 77?

extended the TRO as to the other Defendants so Expeditee could provide additional evidence about which Defendants used the FLAGWIX mark. [Dkt. 55.] On February 15, 2022, the Court later entered a preliminary injunction as to those Defendants. [Dkt. 77.]
▲ ▼
Sarah Burstein | 1 years ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 @91432d0a No, hadn't seen that. Will check it out.