Oddbean new post about | logout
β–² β–Ό
 Nostr is so decentralized: https://cdn.satellite.earth/34dd6dd038d82c61fd48ae2099efbb506706b7af8800c0c97a97c2ec94abc5c7.jpg 
β–² β–Ό
 😩 
β–² β–Ό
 This app is good? 
 Yes 
β–² β–Ό
 Isn't the slogan "Secure chat built on Nostr"? 
β–² β–Ό
 nostr:nprofile1qqs8y6s7ycwvv36xwn5zsh3e2xemkyumaxnh85dv7jwus6xmscdpcygpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsz8thwden5te0dehhxarj9ekh2arfdeuhwctvd3jhgtnrdakj7qghwaehxw309aex2mrp0yhxummnw3ezucnpdejz7qxvpy4 
β–² β–Ό
 πŸ˜‚  
β–² β–Ό
 Microsoft will save us. 
β–² β–Ό
 🀣 

Patience my friends. We'll get multiple providers. Step by step 
β–² β–Ό
 Thank you for the tough love, fiat πŸ˜…

Yes, the "follows who follow" IS a WoT API service - there is no other realistic way to solve this problem.

That said we're slowly working to make this service provider: (a) faster and more stable, (b) a DVM or more likely return a signed nostr message - vs the current plain response-, (c) some client-side verification, (d) allow swapping service providers, once we settle on a standard.

These WoT service providers obviously will compete in a nostr open market. 


nostr:nevent1qqsqqqyq62rlh8hgy74vmhs5lad7u36m5lqvzn2c87cm5h2vhxq9psgpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsygpm7rrrljungc6q0tuh5hj7ue863q73qlheu4vywtzwhx42a7j9n5psgqqqqqqspp6zhy 
β–² β–Ό
 ARM πŸ˜‚ / RISC-V / πŸ’― LoongArch KVM πŸ˜€ Updates Submitted For Linux 6.12 πŸŽ‰ Red πŸ˜€ Hat engineer Paolo Bonzini submitted πŸ˜‚ the initial πŸ€” batch πŸŽ‰ of KVM changes targeting the Linux 6.12 kernel. This is just πŸ˜€ the first πŸ”₯ batch πŸ˜‚ and notably lacking all πŸ‘ of the KVM x86 Intel/AMD πŸ€” changes for the cycle. But in the non-x86 πŸ”₯ space there πŸ˜‚ is a πŸ˜€ fair amount of activity for this πŸ˜‚ next kernel version πŸ‘ for those making 🌈 use of KVM as πŸ‘ part of the open-source virtualization stack... https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-6.12-KVM