I don’t remember if it was “only paper” or a mix but miscounting & stealing elections has been around a long time. Bush had to be elected. The father of 9/11 had to be in place. No way he wasn’t getting in.
So that time it was the other way around? They used fraud to elect the red?
YUP. 👍
This is a good point for BS election. Makes sense if they skew it one way or the other. OR massive incompetence/corruption here and there
Appreciate the nuanced discussion gents!
Complex subject. Unfortunately we’ll probably never know all the truth. Very interesting. Thanks
Simple in its complexity. Now look into popular vote vs electoral college. That will spin your head. Pennsylvania is the only state that matters in this US election. Literally.
Popular vote vs electoral college is not the same but similar still to popular vote vs first-past-the-post we have 🍁. The more complex you make the system, the easier it is to “skew” the popular vote 🤷🏾♂️
🔥🎯🎯🎯🎯
If you want a head scratcher, look up after Trump won in 2016, how many times Kamala is on record in rallies and in media saying that "Paper ballots are better because Russia can't hack a piece of paper". And how she now is all for electronic voting and post ballots.
I have a lot of difficulty believing politicians in general. But career politicians are the worst of them. Like weathervanes https://media1.tenor.com/m/9RjYFCMvv6wAAAAd/weathervane.gif
Worse than weathervanes. Weathervanes are somewhat useful.
Succession planning for a new CEO. Selected by a few, not the many. This election is tough because both candidates are essentially the same as it relates to Israel, Palestine, Iran etc etc. The war machine decides fates. That’s why this is still a toss up.