I'm not familiar with it personally, but looks cool.
If the Tunnel Sats team or somone else from the community packages it for StartOS, then yes, it will be available 😃
We're available to help if anyone wants to take it on, should be pretty straightforward for StartOS 0.3.6 based on the looks of it.
nostr:nprofile1qqs9df4h2deu3aae83fmet5xmrlm4w5l9gdnsy3q2n7dklem7ezmwfcpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduq5xamn8ghj7dnvv45xs7tywde8g6rpvakkjuekw46nvar4vdhxgan6wumkxatzwpckk6rk0puhjdm2da5k7ce5x4kkkumjx3jkzepwdahxjmmwqyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnwdaehgu3wd9hxvmckqw0xz, I started packaging it, but tunnelsats can only be setup if a lightning implementation is already running on the machine.
According to the forums, testnet bitcoind can't be side loaded onto the start9. What would be the easiest/fastest way to spin up core lightning on a start9 without downloading+verifying the entire chainstate?
Is there a way to sideload pre-pruned blocks to set things up more quickly?
https://ezno.de/packages/
Testnet will be enabled after StartOS 0.3.6. Packaging services will also be MUCH easier then. 0.3.6 is already in testing, and services are already being packaged for it. If you hop into our Matrix developer community, we will make sure you get all the help you want from our team. https://matrix.to/#/#developer-space:matrix.start9labs.com
IMHO the problem's name here is "community package".
I don't know how restrictive these Start9 packages have to be and how far they can reach into the Start9 system architecture. TunnelSats requires deep integration into the system layer (wireguard installation, network container implementation, port re-routing w/ nftables, ...). So basically afaik I think we cannot make use of a setup script to install TunnelSats from console but rather ship a s9pk wrapped TS package.
StartOS 0.3.6 exposes all the OS access/features you need. But it certainly needs to be packaged into an s9pk using our guide and SDK
Oddbean new post about login | logout 