Oddbean new post about | logout
 The funniest and saddest thing to me is when people/media/officials comment on protests and say “as long as it’s lawful” “as long as you get a permit.”

Last I checked, the point of a protest was not to make sure that officials and media were comfortable with how it takes place, or if it is for a cause they agree with. 

Now, effectiveness of a protest or movement is another story where folks can agree or disagree. 

Anyway, GM 🌞☕️ 
 Civil disobedience is a separate tool from protest. It's also speech, but by definition unlawful. First Amendment precedent has long allowed reasonable time/place restrictions on speech.

Leaders of change movements should use civil disobedience strategically, because it comes with consequences and often creates a negative image of the movement in the public eye (i.e., the majority inclined to status quo).

Whether any particular instance of civil disobedience is morally correct depends on one's own values and beliefs. So commentators voicing preference for protest, not civil disobedience, are usually expressing their view of the change movement's goals.