nobody is calling it "marketing material" except the DOJ.

YOU ARE TAKING THEIR WORD THAT IS WHAT IT IS, THAT IT WAS USED IN THAT WAY AND ALREADY MAKING ALL KINDS OF ASSUMPTIONS ABOUT IT.

It is a jpg on a website and we know nothing else about it.

but for some reason you find the DOJ narrative very convincing and are already ready to convict them. (although constantly protesting you'd rather it was some other way)

and yet claim to be logical and realistic.

pretty weird honestly.