anyhow, i haven't read the nip that close, but i just wonder why so much more energy goes to it than NIP-42 which actually solves an immediate problem for relays, i think we should have both working, for sure, but i don't know whether this is overly complicated because i had to scroll through three screenfuls of text which seems like a lot of stuff for a simple proxy process
and upon a reread, it really does jam way too many things together
i don't think that bitcoin would have ever been built without none of this, it's only been the post-established-working-protocol that this has been adopted
this specification process should be a wiki
you know, like that thing you been working on @PABLOF7z
if you think nip 42 needs more energy, then contribute to it. it's not up to you to decide who works on what.
the spec is fine
it's the lack of implementation, and how much of an impediment that is to real business use of this protocol