So Saylors analogies on Peter’s podcast are some how even less accurate than the DoJ trying to say a frying pan is a money transmitter.
I haven't listened to that episode yet.
After listening to this episode I think he didn’t think it all through yet. And to be honest, who has really?
Roger Ver 2.0
The thing that he appears to miss is that the conservatism he is looking for is a natural function of the BIP consensus process. There will be civil wars, there will be controversy, but stability of the base chain will be retained.
He also used the term “Nakamoto” to refer to a denomination of Bitcoin. wtf.