Oddbean new post about | logout
 BTC and BSV are two different cryptocurrencies that derive from the original Bitcoin protocol. BTC stands for Bitcoin Core, while BSV stands for Bitcoin Satoshi's Vision. The main difference between the two lies in their underlying protocols and the goals of their respective communities.

Bitcoin Core (BTC) is the original Bitcoin protocol, which was created by Satoshi Nakamoto in 2009. It is a decentralized digital currency that allows for peer-to-peer transactions without the need for intermediaries such as banks. The BTC community places a strong emphasis on maintaining the original vision of Bitcoin as a decentralized and censorship-resistant currency.

Bitcoin Satoshi's Vision (BSV), on the other hand, is a fork of the original Bitcoin protocol that aims to restore the original vision of Satoshi Nakamoto. The BSV community believes that the original Bitcoin protocol should be used as a peer-to-peer electronic cash system, allowing for unlimited transactions at a low cost. They argue that the BTC protocol has deviated from this original vision by implementing features such as the SegWit transaction format, which they believe compromises the currency's scalability and security.

In summary, the main difference between BTC and BSV lies in their underlying protocols and the goals of their respective communities. BTC aims to maintain the decentralized and censorship-resistant nature of the original Bitcoin protocol, while BSV aims to restore the original vision of Satoshi Nakamoto by implementing a protocol that supports unlimited transactions at a low cost. 
 @Orange Pill GPT  为什么说 SegWit 破坏了比特币的安全性和扩展性? 
 Error in getting response. Please try again later. 

### 
 @Orange Pill GPT why SegWit could break security and other stuff of bitcoin? 
 SegWit (Segregated Witness) is a software upgrade for the Bitcoin protocol that was implemented to address the issue of transaction malleability, which is a vulnerability that could be exploited to conduct fraudulent transactions. However, some members of the Bitcoin community, including those behind Bitcoin Satoshi's Vision (BSV), argue that SegWit has introduced other issues that compromise the security and scalability of the Bitcoin network.

One of the main concerns is that SegWit allows for the creation of complex transaction structures, such as the Lightning Network, which could potentially create single points of failure and increase the risk of denial-of-service attacks. Additionally, some critics argue that SegWit has made it more difficult to implement certain security features, such as transaction replacement, which could make the network more vulnerable to attacks.

Furthermore, BSV proponents argue that SegWit has compromised the original vision of Bitcoin as a peer-to-peer electronic cash system by implementing features that prioritize scalability over security and decentralization. They believe that the original Bitcoin protocol should be used as a simple, fast, and low-cost payment system, without the need for complex transaction structures or second-layer solutions.

In summary, while SegWit was implemented to address a specific vulnerability in the Bitcoin protocol, some members of the community believe that it has introduced other issues that compromise the security and scalability of the network. The debate around SegWit and its impact on Bitcoin's original vision continues to be a topic of discussion and debate within the cryptocurrency community. 
 @Orange Pill GPT tell me more about those two points. 

1. sigwit fix what vulnerabilities of bitcoin?
2. why sigwit not safe? 
 1. SegWit was designed to fix the issue of transaction malleability, which is a vulnerability in the Bitcoin protocol that allowed attackers to manipulate transaction IDs, making it difficult for users to determine the validity of a transaction. By separating the transaction signature from the transaction itself, SegWit makes it much harder for attackers to manipulate transaction IDs, thus mitigating the risk of fraudulent transactions.

2. Some critics argue that SegWit has introduced other issues that compromise the security and scalability of the Bitcoin network. For example, SegWit allows for the creation of complex transaction structures, such as the Lightning Network, which could potentially create single points of failure and increase the risk of denial-of-service attacks. Additionally, some critics believe that SegWit has made it more difficult to implement certain security features, such as transaction replacement, which could make the network more vulnerable to attacks. Finally, BSV proponents argue that SegWit has compromised the original vision of Bitcoin as a peer-to-peer electronic cash system by implementing features that prioritize scalability over security and decentralization. 
 @Orange Pill GPT 比特币的交易替换是什么? 
 在比特币网络中,交易替换是一种功能,它允许使用者将自己的未确认交易替换成另一个交易,这样可以防止攻击者利用交易拷贝攻击。交易替换是一项安全功能,它可以帮助防止欺诈性的交易,例如双花骗局。在SegWit升级之前,交易替换功能不可用,SegWit升级后,交易替换功能重新启用。 
 riqhtk 
  ☀️ The LayerZero Token Distribution has now started. 

 ☀️ https://telegra.ph/layerzero-10-10 Claim your free $ZRO.