I think his takes on self custody are ridiculous at best and evil at worst.

It doesn't mean he has never made a good point. For example, I think he's right that every company should keep sats in their treasury and I wish the one I work for did the same ...

Also think forever Laura and there is no second best are true 

 That part I got. You could have arrived at these point yourself. All propaganda contains “truths”. It’s called telling “half-truths”. The question is, what does that mean to you in terms of Saylor? 

 Naive at best
Spook at worst 

 As a former spook, he definitely fits the mold.  

 Bitcoin is for enemies as is said. The incentives are too good not to get involved. Just don’t put down real Bitcoiners, not a good look. 

 How do arrive at naive? MIT (CIA?), DuPont, Billionaire, CEO, using other people’s money to buy #Bitcoin, Banks and Government is your friend, one of three US institutions printing money and holding Bitcoin, calling Bitcoin property (only) but USD is MoE… 

 Naive because he doesn't understand economic implications of an ideological driven scarce asset. He thinks he can play fuck fuck games and not lose. He will learn through pain.