Oddbean

You cannot speak freely about Nazism, Francoism and Fascism because they were regimes that were against communism. On the other hand, you can speak freely about communism and wear t-shirts with its symbol or the face of Che Guevara or Fidel Castro without any problem, despite the fact that they are the ideas that have killed the most people in history. This gives you an idea of who won the cultural battle and who dominates the world.

Samuel Edward Konkin III founder of agorism, was very critical of history, he knew that history is written by the victors and was in favor of historical revisionism, even he himself in his books dared to give his version of the facts about events that occurred during the 19th and 20th century. In order to move forward you need to know the truth, without the truth there is no certain objective. nostr:note1mvjg53tylyz4l7zq80jsf50l7ypts55yff9fdtycuwaz7723znnsuc6zna

Global and allegedly universal anti-human and anti-tradition ideology? Check Centralised government control of economic freedoms and productive activities? Check Victim class and oppressor class? Check Pervasive government surveillance without reasonable suspicion? Check Centrally-promoted fear of wreckers and counter-revolutionaries in league with foreign powers? Check Communism lost the culture war, nobody wears Ms Mao suits. But they won everything else. (Or rather, lost but were then co-opted).

You can speak freely about these things, Just people who are “conscious” about politics will not approve of you. Wearing communist regalia is a rebellious statement in western society, And most of those people actually do not understand what they are trying to support. Usually see the Che shirts around people who think they are Rastafarian because they smoke weed, But have never actually been to Jamaica, And they listen to Bob Marley too much. The millennial and under generations I feel will move further away from this because the status quo is becoming modernism, And people respect the rich or “the right” more than radical liberalism. Kids born today will do nothing but work and their cultural experiences will take place on the internet.

Good introduction, but it is necessary you go the next step: who financed them? Banks with scam-fiat-currency. And who are behind the banks? The Golem And who are the Golem? The chosen people. And who are the chosen people?

Just for the perspective. I own controversial book Mein Kampf by Adolf Hitler. Not to pair with his ideology but I wanted to read where the dude mind was. Anyway, what I wanted to say, is that this is the only book which is not on the book shelf with others.

It is worth reading, but look for a translated edition from the original German. At the time I was shocked with the following points of the book: - Very harsh criticism of the political class who live far away from the problems of the people. - Criticism of the lack of vision of the future of this same political class. - Criticism of communism and the Jews who promote this movement. - Criticism of the banking system dominated by the Jewish lobby. In literary terms it is not a great book, but let's say that it is a dangerous book for the current statism. The part of the book I don't like is the racial part, I don't think it's a problem of races but of cultures and education.