This is a graduation thesis, you know?. Is not a book. and why do you demand answers?. Is a darn good thesis with some mind blowing ideas in it. Even you concede that. The tone of your critique makes your intentions look a little off to me.
He was literally selling it as a book for months and not sharing the PDF publicly. It has a bunch of ideas, sure. But they do not flow to create a logical conclusion that can be acted upon. All I've done is engage in intellectual discourse. I'm not owed a response, though Lowery tried to discredit me earlier by claiming I couldn't critique his ideas without reading the thesis he was paywalling. So here we are.