May i have more context? What did I miss? 

 Some of whirlpool's coinjoin transactions are being filtered by ocean's Bitcoin node. Samourai and others are calling it censorship, but Luke Dashjr is saying it's not intentional or targeted at coinjoin, but some coinjoin transactions do not fall within certain consensus rules, and consequently get filtered.  

 Consensus rules are different from local node policies  

 Correct, a good coinjoin looks like any other txn 

 All implementations (joinmarket,joinstr,whirlpool,wasabi) have their unique on chain footprint 

 Couldn't be more wrong. 

 Ser how many mixes do you recommend to effectively break links? Haven’t gotten any good answers. 

 Just one is fine 

 Thank you. The join implemented on Sparrow check out? 

 Yep, but be careful with your bad bank 

 I do 10+, because low time preference. 

 You would think 

 "Consensus" neq "what all nodes will propagate"

"Consensus" EQ "what all nodes will accept in a block"

Large op_returns don't violate consensus. 

 Your post is making an impact.
Added to the https://nostraco.in/hot feed 

 How many sats would we have to zap this post to have you explain the opcode  angst going on here---> 


nostr:nevent1qqsduyjyjp6gq56cuk03ll0em5s3jnvt2z95q47zfhkjnaqks9d0u7spz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfdupzpckv7l8jqspl8u4y54dn9rcduwlrs4v2040nxce0m2h0cunvrj8tqvzqqqqqqyc57syx