Can you rework the icon to clearly show it’s a problem child ? 

 Has Fedi ever given a reason for their decision not to open source their wallet app? 

I am curious what the business rationale is.

nostr:nevent1qqsdh3escytm8c94vxv4vld3f4d5xp0sl20fz0xj7vwxfusus5yc4fqpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfdupzq7xwd748yfjrsu5yuerm56fcn9tntmyv04w95etn0e23xrczvvraqvzqqqqqqyk9rf08 

 Maybe a “⚠️warning: closed source ⚠️” label. 

The source code cannot be audited, or verified. By using this app you sign up to a greater risk of rugpull, and uncertainty in what happens with your data. 

cc @nielliesmons 

 Can you display it as "Unsigned" and "Unverified"? Although technically you signed it, mmmm.
Maybe sign it with a "Google Playstore"-npub lol 😂 and display it as unverified and with "install at own risk"?
 

 Got it 😂 https://image.nostr.build/b8da08984486e5d5ca7c25ddb58a2285853455024afe85f01dae19ea4dd9c791.jpg  

 Oooooh, a meme isn't a bad idea sir! 

 Signed by Gulag Play Store 

 *Guulagl 

 *Goolag 

 First reaction... delist 

 both options sound bad but this note sounds good. With this approach every decision will be a success🤗 

 Delist first then work on a framework for displaying the appropriate warnings if you decide to relist 

 +1 

 Some warning or delist.  

 delist dawg

embarrasing for wot fans, if a few high profile influencers can trick everyone into installing a closed source app then wot wont work 

 Delist.
Which I will also do with you when you start supporting closed source software. 

 We're creating an app store in an adversarial permissionless environment. "Delisting" is only possible today because we have control during this bootstrap phase. 

Closed source apps, malware and everything in between is coming. We don't want to become yet another "benevolent" dictator - and ultimately we can't as nostr is a permissionless censorship-resistant  protocol.

We will become the best tool for users and developers to find each other with the highest fidelity possible in such an environment.  

 This is the way 

 That makes sense. 
You want to be a truly free market. 
Which just means the people will have to take responsibility for their own choices. 

 For the zapstore "as protocol" the selection will happen client-side with people decide for themself what to download, what relays ping and what npub trust.
But for your relay you need to decide a policy and you are responsible of what it store and for the zap.store npub you are responsible for what you sign. 

 This is the way.  

 add a warning 

 Maybe add a warning in a "github like" way, like you have to type in:
"Closed source app"
to continue. 

Sounds painful, but if ok ok next is possible, people will jump through this warning accidentally.

Just a random idea.