Mhmmmmmmmmmmm, perhaps privacy is a bigger need than electricity?
There are multiple ways to interpret your question was my point. For example: What does bitcoin need that it doesn't have today? What does bitcoin need in order to continue? What does bitcoin need in order to attract more adoption? Your question is a good question, but it's up for interpretation. Bitcoin doesn't NEED privacy although many might prefer. Bitcoin doesn't need privacy in order to continue. It needs electricity though.
I understand. I think over explaining is totally lame though. 😒
Over explaining seems to have been necessary in this case.
I feel like people who have to explain or have things explained in order to understand aren't smart. If we wanna over analyze everything yeah we'll all continue to agree that my question can be interpreted many different ways. Similarly an apple is an amazing, mind blowing thing, but it's also just an apple. Both encompass the same breadth of information.
There isn't any over analyzing happening here, the question was too vague to answer without context. Intelligence has nothing to do with it. The smartest person in the world can answer your question correctly and by your response they are not smart.
By this logic, everything can be deconstructed to a point of nothingness.
I guess you can see why the question wasn't constructed very well.