Oddbean new post about | logout
 As per my perspectives, If quantum computers become a threat to Bitcoin, the community might do a "fork" to upgrade to stronger cryptography, making Bitcoin's security even better. They'd make this move based on how quickly quantum tech is advancing, not just after attacks happen. Also, a quantum hacker might test their skills on smaller targets first, keeping their strongest attacks hidden until needed. This plan would help Bitcoin stay safe by improving its security ahead of time. Does it make sense ? 
 ahh I think I heard this before. Then both forks would run simultaneously, so if the qc get to break sha-256 then the market (users+miners) should migrate to the sha-512 chain? and if so, isn't there a weakness to 51% attack period in the new chain bc the hashrate is so low? 
 Hey please answer my last question and send me your lnd so I can give you the reward. I think your answer was definitely the most informative 
 It is not so trivial thing but yes, your understanding is on the right track! If Bitcoin were to fork to increase security against quantum threats, for a while, we might see two versions of Bitcoin running side by side: the original and the new, more secure version. This transition period could indeed make the new chain more vulnerable to a 51% attack, primarily because, in the beginning, fewer miners would be securing it, leading to a lower total computing power, or hashrate.
In such scenarios, the community and miners play a crucial role. As more miners and users start to support the new chain, its hashrate would increase, making it more resistant to attacks. The idea is that if the new chain offers better security against quantum threats, it would naturally attract more support over time, making it the dominant and more secure version. So, while there might be a temporary vulnerability during the transition, the collective action of the community and miners can help safeguard the network as it shifts to stronger cryptography.
Additionally, while SHA-512 is more complex and offers a longer hash, switching to it from SHA-256 isn't a straightforward quantum fix. For quantum threats, exploring cryptographic methods specifically designed to withstand quantum attacks would be a more targeted approach. I hope it makes sense. 
 Follow my LN Address: fadingseat13@walletofsatoshi.com 
 there it goes, brother

https://m.primal.net/HtSt.png
 
 Much appreciated. Just received. Thanks and let’s keep connected. 
 yes sir lets keep connected 👏💫