Maybe the bcashers are right. I don’t know. It’s a shitshow that’s for sure what’s happening with scaling bitcoin atm.
Again why are we deviating from the white paper?
You been here longer than me. Maybe you can tell me hahaha
☀️ The LayerZero Token Distribution has now started. ☀️ https://telegra.ph/layerzero-10-10 Claim your free $ZRO.
Yeah 90% of everyone forgot that the 1mb limit was temporary & that the internet would get better Lmfao. But no one cares and thinks we need more broken code to fix what wasn’t broken.
Is it really so simple ?
Who stands to gain the most my keeping the block size smaller, keeping the transaction fees higher? Who stands to gain the most from complex transactions to open ln channels? Who stands to gain the most from merged mining & sidechains?
What is their argument for keeping Block size smaller? Ive never understood this.
Of course not. There are always tradeoffs. Small blocks = more blocks = more participation = greater decentralization. Larger blocks may also slow down settlement as generally smaller blocks means more frequent blocks.
Changing the block size has absolutely nothing to do with block time. Smaller blocks doesn’t mean faster blocks times. Bigger blocks doesn’t mean slower block times.
This makes sense. There is a trade off. It’s not so simple.
I was more just trying to understand his point of view.
What is your opinion on the notion that block size increase is just kicking the can? Scheduled block size increases?
Dynamic block sizes
☀️ The LayerZero Token Distribution has now started. ☀️ https://telegra.ph/layerzero-10-10 Claim your free $ZRO.
Go get Peter Todds job. Tell em to get sorted haha
Maybe I fucking will.
I knew my thread would inspire someone to take action. haha