You can try putting put a bounty to see if a dev wants to work on it. Most devs will only accept it in sats though, so you'll became a Bitcoin talker yourself.
I think I'll just continue to use nostr sparingly and go to twitter more. Devs invested in the success of Nostr should just do it, if they have any hopes of Nostr succeeding. imo
I don't think that's how FOSS works, or should work. If there is a high demand for a feature, devs will definitely work on it. Of the demand isn't there, those interested on getting the feature need to offer value to receive that what they value. Not sure I'd want to step back into the dumpster fire that is twitter, nor it'll make much difference now that Elon Musk has been asked to work for a gov department with the acronym "Doge", just my two sats.
There is no demand from current users because nostr has only attracted and retained bitcointwitter users. The demand comes from the people who have left, quit, poked their head in etc found a lack of content and written off nostr as a bubble and bitcointwitter clone.
*no demand should be: little/no demand.
Sure there's a lot of Bitcoin content, but there's a lot of non-Bitcoin content too. Permaculture, crafts & art, music, general ranting... If you find some topics specifically lacking, you can always start talking about them yourself. I have people in my follow list that never or very rarely would speak about Bitcoin. I agree it can be challenging to curate the feed out of any Bitcoin content atm, but imo that's a phase that will eventually pass as userbase grows.
The other content is few and far between. And even those users are incentivised to appeal to bitcointwitter tastes, as it's the dominant culture here. And it seems like a feedback loop and is very much solidifying who is here and what gets posted and engaged with. Just from my limited observations obvs