Oddbean new post about login | logout Sorry, that doesn't even make strategic sense. If I wanted to implement Agenda 21 + Agenda 2030, I would install a candidate like Joe Biden or Kamala Harris. Not someone that is pro-energy and antithetical to the climate alarmism agenda.
The #SurveillanceState agenda had been advanced under the #Trump presidency (check out recent @Whitney Webb interviews on JD Vance/Thiel connections) and Trump had been instrumental during Covid-19 to set the vaccine roll-out and try to get the conservatives on board with taking the jab. He even awarded Fauci for his involvement in the Warp Speed operation. Of course, Trump isn’t going to pitch the talking points from Agenda21 but the surveillance state is a major component of the globalist takeover. It’s like Republican states pushing for #DigitalID verification to access online websites under the pretense of protecting the children. There is always a good excuse to advance the enslavement agenda. This agenda can be advanced from both sides with talking points tailored for each camp. It doesn’t matter to the globalists whether the blue or red team win as long as they own the winner. https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/president-trump-awards-presidential-commendations-operation-warp-speed-team/
They have different agendas for different regions and results. In fact it gives them headway to move if unexpected things happen. Get out of you shoes and into theirs and your strategies will look different. Look at the things all of those selected politicians around the world fight against. Privacy, Monero, home gardening, natural medicine, tax "evasion", home schooling,.,.
I understand their strategies which is why I focus on the UN Agenda 21. It's not hard to understand once you study the code (Agenda 21) and put your mind into their shoes.