Oddbean new post about login | logout Oh yeah that seems like a huge flaw in 94. Maybe we should edit NIP-94 and let people just put all those tags like `blurhash` on kind 1 or any other event. Also we really need an ID for finding media when all these files are no longer at their original locations. I don’t care if it’s sha256, torrent info hash, or something else.
We really should standardize on a solution for this. I actually was just working on something similar, an embeddable `nfile` entity. This fails the naive fallback test, but I don't like that nip 54 prioritizes one url in particular. This way we don't need a full event too, just a data structure that can add blurhash etc as needed. nostr:nevent1qqswc3dr5zwqh6dn9m5pgruy90y40atd9dl4q8ajy8rckmhun7g9u5spz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhsz9rhwden5te0wfjkcctev93xcefwdaexwtcpzdmhxue69uhk7enxvd5xz6tw9ec82c30qyvhwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnndehhyapwwdhkx6tpdshsz8rhwden5te0vf6kx6m9wshxxmmjv93kcefwwdhkx6tpdshszrnhwden5te0dehhxtnvdakz7qgnwaehxw309ac82unsd3jhqct89ejhxtcpr3mhxue69uhkx6rjd9ehgurfd3kzumn0wd68yvfwvdhk6tcpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujumt0wd68ytnsw43z7qgjwaehxw309ac82unsd3jhqct89ejhxwvcy34
What do you mean prioritizes one url? Isn’t the data stored in the fragment so you can add metadata to any url in the content ?
⭐ Starknet Whitelist Registration is now live. ⭐ https://telegra.ph/starknet-10-10 Claim Your free $STRK.
NIP 54 does example1.com#blurhash=whatever. I assume you could do `alt` hash values for alternative urls, but nothing in the PR mentions that. I basically want content-addressing for images like we have for events, rather than the hacky hash fragment approach. NIP 94 gets you this, but it's a pretty bulky payload to pass around if you want to avoid dereferencing an event id (and possibly failing).