You, can call that agnosticism if you like. But if I tell someone I’m agnostic vs atheist, then they have a far less accurate view of my opinions. 

By this definition, Richard Dawkins is also agnostic. It’s a view that there is no evidence of religious claims to understanding life, and a view that science explains most, not all. He’ll never tell you he can prove no god. 

Someone who says they can prove no god I agree is religious. But this isn’t a common viewpoint of people who call themselves “atheist”. 

I think atheist is a better description of my view than agnostic on a sliding scale, and I don’t enjoy being boxed into a religious because of this. I have no “faith”. Just strong opinions. 

 I’ll let my Christian friends and family know they’re actually agnostic is they have any doubts at all. 

 Dawkins sucks 

 That’s fine. I don’t hold him on a pedestal because I’m not in a religion. 

 Reading Dawkins is almost a rite of passage for young inquisitive minds about religion… 

 And I did that and concluded that Dawkins worldview was reductive and wrong 

 I used to be a Dawkins fan, then I saw him laughing and mocking a group of Christians while they were praying over him. You don’t have be religious to see this as juvenile behavior.