Oddbean new post about | logout
 learned today that there's research on optimal rest during workouts and looks like the 2-3 minute range is the sweet spot for max hypertrophe  
 Dang so not 2-3 hours? Fuuuck 
 right? i was hoping days ... 
 https://youtu.be/rTAEx9WDNKg 
 Thanks, will watch, realized most of my lifting knowledge came from playing baseball 20 years ago and I never went back to learn again 
 Pavel Tsatsouline has unorthodox theories. But they are backed by a lot of Russian research, and experience. Very different to the western approach. 
 Unorthodox + your endorsement go far 
 I used to lift alot. Alot alot. I like Pavel because he explains things I felt intuitively, but ignored because of orthodox training beliefs that were common at the time. I’ve since learned to go with the intuition it many things. 
 I would say I am heavily indexed on intuition but every once in a while so I like to pull up and just think again. The danger is I trust my intuition so far that I lose neuroplasticity or get stuck in my ways.

It's been fruitful so far ... Most of what I did 20 years ago for baseball is still true but there are some findings around optimization that have been helpful. 

Watching your recommendation now 
 Coming back to this. Thought the video was great. The algo picked up on the video and has recommended more around Russian training vs american training. Wanted to gather thoughts on these questions:

-How would you load weight in an exercise as a % of your max? 60%, 80%, 100%?
-Do you recommend going to failure?
-How many exercises a week for a muscle group? 
 Preface: this entire approach focuses on strength gains above all else. It ignores physique entirely. It’s pure Russian powerlifting training. It also thinks in terms of elite athletes, and performance.

From Pavels perspective, the percentage is relative. Meaning, if you are using weight where you reach lactic acid saturation (failure) at 8 reps, train at 75% of the rep count as a baseline. So around 5 or 6. If you are doing 6 rep max, train at 4. Etc.

Using a month as a time increment for gains, the main concept, as I understand it, is to create a difficult, and varying demand requirement for the muscles for the first two weeks of the month. Which according to Pavel, is the maximum time your endocrine system can handle those kinds of demands in a month period. Then for the rest of the month, you just do a standard 75% set, for 2 or 3 sets. The last two weeks are less intense, and are setting the weight as a new norm for your body.

Then the next month, you add 10lbs., and repeat. If your body isn’t ready for the new weight, do 5lbs, or do another month at the same weight. It’s not like you’re losing anything.
You start the next month by doing max reps. So if 8 reps is max, do 8 reps. So the first work out of the month is an ass kicker for each muscle group.  Then for the next two weeks, the variation period is varied through lifting intensity, speed of the lift (this is actually very effective) , and maybe an extra rep, or one less, changing rest periods between sets, (which again according to Pavel should be twice as long as the western norm), all done around the 75% of max reps principle.

There are lots of schools of thought about all this, but a lot of the strength guys swear by it. But the strength dudes are a different breed that the body builders.

When I did stuff like this, I would rest extra the last few days of the month, eat more, and sleep more if I could, then attack. 
 Love it, thank you! 

What was funny is I think the baseball coaches I had must have picked some of this up because the rep range and weight progression you and the videos talk about are closer to what I do then the "American way"
 
 Doing less you'll be making more of a cardio exercise, and risk not taking the muscle close to failure. 
 They didn't given reasoning, just data, but I would buy this reasoning