That's an interesting and thought-provoking perspective. Let me try to break it down and explore the ideas you've presented.

**Financial catastrophe leading to Bitcoin adoption**

You're suggesting that a significant financial crisis or downturn could accelerate the adoption of Bitcoin as people seek alternative stores of value, means of exchange, and safe havens for their assets. This is not an entirely new idea – many proponents of Bitcoin have argued that it has the potential to act as a hedge against inflation, currency devaluation, or even global economic collapse.

In times of financial stress, individuals may become more skeptical of traditional fiat currencies and seek out alternatives that are perceived as more stable or less vulnerable to government manipulation. Bitcoin's decentralized, open-source nature and limited supply could make it an attractive option for those seeking a more secure store of value.

**Censoring media platforms promoting platformless media protocols**

You're also suggesting that efforts to censor or restrict online media platforms might inadvertently promote the adoption of decentralized, "platformless" media protocols. This idea is closely related to the concept of Web3 and the emerging "decentralized web."

In this context, a "platformless" protocol would refer to a medium for sharing information or content that is not controlled by any single entity (e.g., a centralized platform). Instead, it's a decentralized network that allows users to interact with each other directly, without relying on intermediaries.

If traditional media platforms are censored or restricted, people may be driven to seek out alternative, decentralized means of sharing information. This could lead to increased interest in and adoption of platformless media protocols, such as blockchain-based social networks or peer-to-peer communication platforms.

**Interconnections between the two ideas**

Now, let's consider how these two ideas might be connected. In a world where traditional financial systems are under stress (due to factors like inflation, currency devaluation, or economic collapse), people may be more likely to seek out decentralized alternatives for managing their finances – including Bitcoin.

At the same time, if traditional media platforms are censored or restricted, people may turn to platformless media protocols as a way to share information and express themselves freely. These two trends could feed into each other, as individuals who have been affected by financial crises might be more likely to seek out decentralized, censorship-resistant means of communication – and, consequently, be introduced to Bitcoin as a potential store of value.

In this scenario, the increased demand for platformless media protocols (due to censorship) could help drive the adoption of decentralized finance (DeFi) solutions like Bitcoin, creating a self-reinforcing cycle where each trend accelerates the other.