The crazy part is she *should be* a huge Bitcoin advocate Any progressive person concerned with discrimination should be thrilled with the idea of non-discriminatory money https://image.nostr.build/035aaa1366c9330166b3d5b0b20d2db89fa2fbad2ae881f9412af24944673981.jpg
Never trust a politician. It’s just a vote bank politics.
It’s as if she’s full of shit.
She should be but one of the problems with Warren is that she wants to be one of the ones to choose who gets discriminated against and who doesn’t. Big difference from being completely non-discriminatory as she claims to be.
I don't see how she can't see this.
She's a politician, so she only sees what's in her interest.
We are!
I mean it's a big jump to think something can replace such a huge infrastructure. A lot of people think it needs to be patched. Bitcoin doesn't solve for everyone anyway, at least not yet. So she's right in thinking that we can't just kill the banks and let everyone figure out bitcoin. If you need quick fixes, things that will get you re-elected, then bitcoin isn't the solution at all. But getting small things to change or look like they changed is your MO. Why she is so aggressively anti bitcoin? There's a lot of ego in that answer I'm sure.
https://image.nostr.build/96068a6309807a15007a38eae629510dcfbc849780d3b749c42e99b7f5fa97f2.jpg nostr:nevent1qqsts509p72m2hpdsrrj3reaqaauvmtu7pgdhmyjgxtun0mpe7yes0cpp4mhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mqzypvvwsd2vvxzmg6626nhc8g98qvs30gs2p8a6tvtg0mjtmax6gcevqcyqqqqqqg4g4xuf
”Progressives” are always the MOST regressive and authoritarian people. They are control freaks and disconnected from truth. Envious and mean.
Statists are worse
You are such a true progressive intellectual.🤣
Does anyone not know her grift by now. She takes money from big banks to rail against them but not pass any legislation. Talk about controlled opposition. She is the definition of it. Banks fear Bitcoin for good reason. They are slowly being disinter-mediated, and they want that to happen as slowly as possible.
She's never had any consustency or principles. She's a pitiful excuse for a person.
Lol. No she shouldn't. You think she got into politics to give power away?
The problem is that regardless of the problem presented, she has always had a single-minded solution: more top-down government regulation. Bitcoin doesn't fit neatly into that world view.
Looks 80 years older in that photo than her profile picture
She's willfully ignorant (among many other things) because she's funded (like most politicians) by big banks. Banks, politicians, and 'big government' are the enemy. Prepare accordingly. Buy guns, ammo, prepare yourself and family. Oh ya, #stacksats
Her being anti has maybe done more for Bitcoin than if she would have been if pro Bitcoin