😂 podcast? Which one of Peter’s or Matt’s written articles is the podcast? 

Not sure what “podcast” you heard there, but did those voices in your head tell you that Peter and Matt were wrong?

You know, telling me “the voices said so”, would actually be more evidence and logic than what you presented!

I learned a lot here. Peter, Matt and everyone are wrong. But only you know why but you can’t explain. But the answer is somewhere on your website but you’re too busy to tell me what it is. 😂😂

I’m sad that you became so busy when you couldn’t articulate an answer. I was hoping you were going to try and explain why Peter and Matt were wrong. Oh well. 🤷‍♂️ 

 I told you the answer, you simply don't believe me. You've got alot more research to do. Best of luck. 

 Oh, you’re not busy anymore! Hope you had the time to read the thread with Matt Black. 

Correction: you told me your opinion and couldn’t provide any logic or evidence. Everyone can see you didn’t answer anything. Btw, you know that only midwits believe strongly in something they can’t defend, right? Must have been a blow to your ego to discover you had nothing. 

I know, I know. The answer is just that Peter Todd, Matt Corallo, everyone is wrong. But why? …And you can’t explain. 🤡😂

It’s funny how you keep responding to me with nothing. I must be living rent free in there. 

 Apologies I can't find time to reply to lazy douchebags who'd rather save face with insults and emojis than do any actual research.

You've been wrong about several points in this discussion and when you're wrong you brush over them and move on to the next goal post.

I've already told you that CTV doesn't cause MEV, out of band payments are no diff than LN payments, and even Peter Todd says "It’s fair to say that CTV has the broadest support among the technical community of any covenant opcode proposal because of its relative simplicity and wide range of use-cases."

Best of luck with more podcast "research" of yours. 

 Hey, you read Peter’s paper! Nice. You finally figured out that it wasn’t a podcast. 👍

Notice that Peter didn’t say “because it’s risk free”. Or maybe you didn’t? You got distracted on his comment regarding use cases. We weren’t even talking about that. 🤷‍♂️

Ah, you’re busy now. Still waiting for you to explain why Peter is wrong about the risk. I guess I’m going to be here a long time. 😴

PS. Remember, those who feel strongly about something they can’t defend…