Oddbean new post about login | logout Because the UN is a globalist arm. What was started for peace is not where it’s ended up
UN forces are literally nowhere deployed for offensive purpose, while armies of some countries clearly have been and are at the moment - yet you choose to label UN as some kind of rouge organization waging war in the world. Seems to me like you have absolutely no idea what you are talking about.
I’m talking about what they have planned not what is current although UN forces are far from peaceful
The Globalist plan is a United States of Europe with its own UN army. Centralising and bringing together all aspects. WHO, UN, BIS Central Banking ‘Green deal’ BS . ID with CBDC.
The UN was never started for the purpose of peace. That was just a cover story. https://m.primal.net/KypP.jpg
UN security council - The Security Council has five permanent members—the United States, China, France, Russia, and the United Kingdom—collectively known as the P5. Any one of them can veto a resolution.
