Oddbean new post about | logout
 Towards the end of the Auckland Central electorate debate, I heard the National candidate, Mahesh Muralidhar, say something neoliberals normally don't admit in public;

"... over the last 6 years... there's been a strategic shift of power... [from] businesses into government... What... our future government is going to do, is we're going to make a strategic shift of power back from government, back to... businesses..."
 https://theworkinggroup.podbean.com/e/nz-taxpayers-union-and-working-group-election-debate-auckland-central/

#podcast #TheWorkingGroup #neoliberalism 
 Mahesh Muralidhar tried to hedge this statement by tacking on "consumers and" before each reference to "businesses", and tacking on a handwave at "communities" on the end. But when you prune out that meaningless decoration, what he said is pretty clear. National will strip decision-making power from democratic institutions accountable to citizens, and give it to profit-motivated ones accountable only to owners. Our only role in their "democracy" is deciding where to shop. One dollar, one vote. 
 Oscar Sims, the Auckland Central Labour candidate, dropped this clanger;

"We're not doing a wealth tax... it's not the right time for it, there isn't the public support for it.  That's why the Green Party are polling at 11%."

https://theworkinggroup.podbean.com/e/nz-taxpayers-union-and-working-group-election-debate-auckland-central/

Wrong, wrong, and wrong.

First, both Greens and TPM leaders said during the Powerbrokers debate that it's a bottom line. So if Labour want to remain  in government, they *are* doing a wealth tax.

(1/?)