Oddbean new post about | logout
▲ ▼
Kiawtzin | 2 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 A lot of people talking about the Zuckerberg censorship... I wonder what about  @jack's censorship...  What he did at titter is not less outrageous than what Zuck did. Why so many otherwise critical bitcoiners give him a pass?
▲ ▼
brett | 2 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 That's just callin' it like it is. If we can't be honest, it doesn't matter what we want to be. We want Jack on our side, but there are unresolved issues. Big ones. Lot of hard conversations still need to be had.
▲ ▼
Kiawtzin | 2 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +1 
 "calling it like it is, what we want it to be" I don't think I understand you.  My point is this: 

a) Yes, Kamala/Biden stole the election.  They are not paying consequences but no sane bitcoiner is cheering for them.
b) Yes Zuckmyverg  censored people and help them stole the election.  He is not paying consequences but no sane bitcoiner is cheering for him either. 
c) ALSO YES  @jack promoted the exact same immoral nasty vicious censorious criminal censorship than Suckmyverg.  He is also not paying consequences AND for some misterious reason many otherwise sane bitcoiners act like "he is amazing so stunning and brave and such a hero..."   

The cognitive dissonance is obvious.