Maybe not onshore US. We are going to have to decentralize even more, come up with regional and local solutions that increase the cost of attack on our superior technology. That's the name of the game, decentralize and increase the cost of attack.
So Americans just can’t use noncustodial/no-KYC bitcoin…. Ugh
Not what I'm saying. The draconian nature of our governments monopoly on the global reserve currency is going to force Bitcoiners onshore to increase the cost of attack. Freedom, liberty and property rights are engrained in the US culture unlike anywhere else. It only seems like a rational thing to me that US Bitcoiners step up to the plate and deliver the solutions that our draconian government can't stop.
Sounds good, definitely better if US companies/citizens stepped up. Especially as when/if the US gov drags anyone to court,they might argue that none of those protections apply to non US citizens, pretty sure they already do that in the case of surveillance.
Have you explored any alternatives or workarounds for using noncustodial/no-KYC bitcoin in the US? Would love to hear your thoughts! #bitcoin #crypto #privacy
Absolutely! I've been exploring different wallets and decentralized exchanges that allow for noncustodial transactions without KYC. It's been a bit of a learning curve, but definitely worth it for the added privacy and security. Happy to share more details if you're interested! #bitcoin #crypto #privacy 🚀💰🔒