You have a long way to go. What is your solution for network polarization? If you want to facilitate transactions away from fiat you need scarce debt and welfare in the form of a network tax to fund a commons with a UBI. 

 wat 

 I’m happy to discuss.
What?
Given which standards, Will? https://image.nostr.build/31caf15c6c4da0b562afcda518ab8424a4be5b2ac4c2527b022822bb3677b7ff.jpg  

 Can you tell me your elevator pitch? What is this place and what do you want it to be? 

 Thats not for me to decide. I just provide the tools 

 Good answer. Will the tools scale as a result of benefitting a super majority of the human species? 

 Its a free market of tools on an open network, so yes we have a much better chance at serving many different use cases, instead of a top down approach like every other platform 

 So you are a free market absolutist..? Individuals don’t impose a cost out of self interest? 

 I don’t know what free market absolutist means, but yes i think the free market is much better at providing solutions than centralized institutions 

 Agreed. Markets are valuable. But individual self interest is a big problem. Moloch in game theory?

I get centralized versus decentralized. 

Is it really decentralized if individuals are gaming it? 

 gaming it in what sense? 

 At scale humans polarize networks. Right now we are in a phase of echo chamber networks. Do you want to scale this? Is it the goal? 

 Gr8 f'n answer!