It's a matter of principle. If a anyone only steals $100 it's "better" than if he stole $1000, or all your money.
It's why you'll thank a cop that lowers the charges for a ticket, even if you're a single mother that needs every dime to feed her kids.
#taxationIsTheft
So when you are taxed less, it's "better" for your situation, but the offense is the same. The fact that they claim a coercive right to your money means they set the amount, you're a victim just the same.
IMHO There is no moral difference.
true, true, but I was just pointing out that there hasn't been a politician in the last 50 years to decrease government spending or government funded programs.
It's like the old joke...
“Would you sleep with me for a million dollars?”
“You know," she giggles, "I think I would.”
“Would you sleep with me for 50 dollars?”
“Really, what kind of a woman do think I am?”
“We've already established that. Now we're just haggling about the price”