@300ec228 

> I did this for transportation - to try and convince my wife that driving a car was not, in fact, safer than biking. I don't remember the absolute numbers, but biking and walking were the lowest risk of death or serious injury per mile traveled for personal transportation, and nearly the same (the Williamsburg colonists were onto some with their walking helmets).

I would suspect this is highly variable based ont he location.. Biking in the city is far more dangerous than through the woods or in the suburbs I suspect.

Moreover it would vary greatly from city to city. Cities with guarded bike lanes would probably be quite safe whereas cities that require cars to occupy the same space as bikes are likely very dangerous.

@04a10faa 

 This was US transportation stats - averaging city and country.  

The problem with country roads, is they are narrow and twisty with no shoulder or bike path/lane - and are actually quite dangerous when you encounter a car, even if there are fewer cars.  

Cities and suburbs have extensive bicycle infrastructure, with a network of "no motorized vehicles" paths and lanes.  Plus "secret" routes where no car could ever go that are fun to discover. 

 @300ec228 

Not in philly, though we are probably well outside the avg. In philly there are few if any bike lanes. When they exist they arent guarded. And the drivers are more than happy to kill you for sport :)

@04a10faa