If you really care about the full context, listen to the podcast episode I referenced and tell me if you think he’s not a statist haha 

 I have. And I don’t agree. It’s a simple take. 
You’re a statist if xyz.  

Nuance matters. And the real world does as well. 

 Fiat currency is here to stay for generations and billionaires are not going to self custody. Where is the lie in those statements? 

 There’s no point in arguing about the future of fiat or how billionaires will custody their bitcoin because no one knows what’s going to happen. My point is that we shouldn’t trust saylor simply because he stacks a lot of Bitcoin especially when he seems like a huge statist and doesn’t support open source development. 

 Diplomacy bro. No one wants to get their heads chopped off 

 Exactly until Billionaires don’t rely on the state for some measure of protection, securing resources, whatever is provided, it all shall exist. People will keep doing stuff to get the things they want and at some point they don’t care at all about hidden costs. Check your desperation and motivation but how do you really know until you are tested? 

 That’s very possible and something I considered but we can’t ever know what is in his mind so his intentions don’t matter to me. His actions do. If he did block Bitcoin development, then fuck him. It’s like Michael Bitstein said, “everyone is a scammer.” Saylor is stacking his bag with tools that people like us don’t have access to. No one can get loans at the interest rates he can. People like us need the open source development of things like mutiny, sparrow, nostr, mempool.space, whirlpool. 

 All FIAT will be gone in under 30 years. 

 I hope so. It definitely wouldn’t surprise me. 

 Yes, most people are statists. Bitcoin helps protect one from them. Ironically, Saylor's acquisition and holding strategy strengthens bitcoin and fosters more liberty. Net positive in my opinion  

  https://image.nostr.build/bfa4f6eaa4beca7730439b5ab037325f7a45f093b0e2dd893fe13791b913fbab.jpg  

 You know me. I have zero idea who the fuck you are.  And don’t really care. Tbh. 
Go……….fuck………yourself.  Directly in your own face. 

  https://image.nostr.build/f19f480776eb8f76181203c6da5140f49b79dc48886921dd73714868ca0c8b59.gif  

 Bitcoin is for enemies. No gatekeepers here 

 You’ve clearly never been to a conference 😂 

 Nope. Keep on stroking your egos 

 Just because you aren’t around them doesn’t mean they don’t exist. 

I prefer to know the enemy than pretend they don’t exist. 

 Gold or real estate aren’t MOE either. 
He’s saying yet. It could be. Could, not should or will be. 

For our lifetime & the next you’re better off dealing in the reality of Digital Real Estate or Gold with the ability to borrow against it while converting the the local currency of where you live. 

 Saylor is losing the plot

It’s Peer to peer digital cash

Not

Peer to peer digital gold

And not

Peer to peer digital real estate 

 The plot is there is no plot. Bitcoin doesn't give a fuck, use it however you want to. 

Just don't infringe on mine or anyone else's right to use it how we want to.  

 Man, what a day. 
 https://i.nostr.build/WG5zk.gif 

 🍿 

 Because he's the #1 ETF pumper out there 

 🧐 

 Exactly. And also, what etf has ever publicly stated they are using their personal funds to support open source devs?

None. That I know of. What funds?  Fees from the ETF?  So anyone buying the ETF are the ones funding devs?  Doesn’t pass the smell test. 

 https://opensats.org/blog/recurring-donations-from-bitwise-bitcoin-etf-bitb 

 Thx for sharing. 

 Sure, with illegal, behind the scenes, manipulation tactics dealing directly with public ETF’s?

Are people fucking retarded? 

 I don't follow where you're going with this.  

 If the original point is completely baseless & retarded; then all points following that will be the same. 

Your confusion is warranted.