Oddbean new post about | logout
▲ ▼
captjack | 9 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +4 
 100% new NIPs should break old NIPs but can improve or add a feature. kind of same analogy BIP forking bitcoin or rolling out segwit n taproot while legacy address still can work
▲ ▼
captjack | 9 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 shouldNOT
▲ ▼
Kennedy 🫎 😎 Cat | 9 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 Wabi sabi repairs … awe did I understand something from my spiritual to programming? Constantly mending & making better (hopefully) as we each build on the next level …
▲ ▼
captjack | 9 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +1 
 shouldn't
▲ ▼
Matt Warren | 9 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +2 
 It's called backward compatibility.
▲ ▼
Mike Dilger | 9 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag +5 
 Yes, new NIPs that intend to be a better version of an old NIP.... not just changing the old NIP while nobody is looking.
▲ ▼
captjack | 9 months ago (raw) | root | parent | reply | flag 
 100% 🎯 
Proposal vs Push vs Adoption
mass/majority consensus wins